Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wendy Parker's avatar

I wasn't expecting a revelation today, and boy was I wrong. The hate is getting to me. I'm having a very hard time viewing anyone who still supports this regime as human. (As evidenced in my daily piece today.) I like to say, "Haha - it's satire," but it's not all haha. I despise these fools and don't like the 'me' they bring forth, if I'm totally honest. I have sweet little dreams of horrible things happening to them and I dig it. I really do. It's not healthy. I'm not promising anything but I will honor the truths here with my own self reflection.

Expand full comment
The Wise Wolf's avatar

This entire article is feelings and flowery language with zero Scripture, zero evidence, and zero engagement with actual research. Let me address your "arguments":

"Most theologians see it as mythic symbolism"

Which theologians? You don't name one. Meanwhile:

Justin Martyr (2nd Apology, 5) discusses angels literally breeding with women. Tertullian (On the Apparel of Women, 1.2) describes angels who "contaminated" women they took as wives. Irenaeus (Against Heresies, 4.16) references angels who "went after strange flesh." These aren't allegorical readings. These are literal interpretations from Church Fathers.

You claim it's "mythic symbolism" but Genesis 6:4 says "and also AFTER that." After the flood. Then Numbers 13:33 records Nephilim in Canaan, post-flood. 2 Samuel 21:20 describes a giant with six fingers and six toes. Deuteronomy 3:11 gives Og's bed measurements: 13 feet long. Those are physical descriptions, not metaphors.

"19th-century newspaper reports were hoaxes"

You dismiss 1,500+ newspaper articles spanning 1840-1920 as "misidentified animal bones" without examining a single one. The Smithsonian has been directly asked about these skeletons and refuses to produce them. You call that "correction." Others call it evidence removal. You don't address WHY the skeletons disappeared if they were just misidentified.

"Evil does not require supernatural DNA"

Ephesians 6:12: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

Paul explicitly states the battle ISN'T just flesh and blood. It's spiritual powers. Examining how those powers might operate through bloodlines doesn't shift responsibility. Both human corruption AND spiritual warfare can exist simultaneously.

"The real mark of the beast is belief that empathy is optional"

Revelation 13:16-17 describes a literal mark on the right hand or forehead required for buying and selling. You're redefining biblical prophecy as a metaphor for "lack of empathy" because the actual text doesn't fit your worldview.

Your Entire Strategy:

You wrote an entire article about Nephilim theory without:

Citing a single Bible verse

Addressing genealogical records in Burke's Peerage

Explaining RH-negative blood incompatibility with human pregnancy

Explaining 1,000-ton stones at Baalbek

Explaining Göbekli Tepe built 11,500 years ago

Addressing Dr. Michael Heiser's PhD research

Addressing Gary Wayne's 600+ page work with 1,200 footnotes

Responding to ANY specific archaeological or genetic evidence

Instead you wrote vague spiritual platitudes about "empathy" and "laughing at ourselves." That's not rebuttal. That's dismissal without engagement.

You claim to be a "living saint" but won't answer if you practice witchcraft. You cherry-pick which Scripture is "real" based on your personal authority. You write an article attacking biblical research without using any biblical citations. And you position yourself as spiritually superior while calling others fearful and delusional.

Proverbs 26:4-5: "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes."

You've written poetry about empathy. Others have cited Genesis, Revelation, genealogical records, and archaeological evidence. Readers will notice the difference.

Truth doesn't need flowery language. It just needs facts. Try using some.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts